Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Charleston “From Below”

A number of years ago my brother David introduced me to the idea of seeing the world "from below." I sometimes don't know whether to thank him or curse him for it.

The phrase comes from the writings of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a minister who opposed Hitler during World War II and died for it. The phrase refers to seeing the events of world history—and the world around us—from the perspective of the oppressed, the outcasts, the suffering, the mistreated, the powerless. History is almost always written from the perspective of the powerful and the victorious. It is most often the story of the rich, the educated, the successful, and the privileged. This is probably unavoidable, to some extent, since they are the ones who write it.

Not only do we see history from the perspective of the privileged, we generally see life from that perspective. The very fact that you are reading a blog on the internet is probably an indication that you belong to the American middle or upper class. You are, as am I, part of the privileged minority in this world. And our viewpoint on life cannot help but be shaped by that reality—we see the world "from above." The challenge is to learn to see the same events, the same realities, the same relationships, the same policies, and the same society from the viewpoint of those who experience them from below rather than from above.*

As my brother explained the concept to me, and as I later continued to reflect on it, I realized that I had already been learning to see the world from below—a little at a time to be sure, but nonetheless in life-changing ways. The first time I can remember seeing "from below" was at an event in high school, sitting with African-American friends when the band struck up Dixie—and everyone stood. The next time was when my American history teacher in college made us read Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee and forever changed the way I would think about cowboys and Indians. The journey has continued, and in recent years has changed the way I see the struggle between Israelis and Palestinians—again with my brother's insightful and disturbing help.

On our recent vacation, Judy and I visited the city of Charleston, SC—a city filled with beautiful homes and historic sites. We visited the home of Thomas Heyward, a signer of the Declaration of Independence. George Washington rented this house for a week on a presidential visit to Charleston. We also toured the antebellum home of William Aiken, governor of South Carolina in the 1840s. We saw lavish homes decorated with striking architecture, beautiful antique furniture, lovely gardens, and fine art. But as I strolled through the buildings, I really didn't see all that.

Everywhere I looked I saw luxury enjoyed at the expense of human suffering. What I saw were not beautiful mansions, but small slave quarters above the kitchen where slaves burned themselves preparing the sumptuous meals of their masters. I saw a huge dining room where slaves scurried to wait on the waiting wealthy. I saw the laundry where sweating slaves labored to clean the expensive fabrics worn by those who owned both the clothing and the cleaners. I saw the back stairs used by the slaves so they wouldn't "disturb the family."

I saw rows of beautiful homes just around the corner from the slave market. I saw canons and fortifications used to defend the right of the rich to own the enslaved. I saw churches built by slaves, who then had to worship in the balcony. I saw one church that slaves built for themselves, but which was then closed in 1834 when South Carolina outlawed all-black churches along with education for slaves.

From below, Charleston did not look so pretty.

I sometimes think I'd like not to see this way. But it seems as though some sort of surgery was done to correct my eyesight. And even if it were possible, who would want to have surgery done to take away your eyesight?

I think I am seeing a lot more clearly these days. You just may not want me as your tour guide in Charleston.


 

*For more on Bonhoeffer's "view from below," check out this blog from my friend, Larry James: http://larryjamesurbandaily.blogspot.com/2008/06/bonhoeffer-on-racism.html

11 comments:

Larry James said...

Rob, thanks for the props. Hope you are well. Like your blog.

Here's another one--with YouTube--that will instruct about living "below" and redefining this thing called faith. . .
Best!

Larry James said...

Ooops, forgot the link: http://larryjamesurbandaily.blogspot.com/search?q=on+the+waterfront

There it is!

Michael McRay said...

very nice Rob. i think it's a good problem to have. let's pray the rest of the USA learns to see clearly in the future. good entry.

Anonymous said...

Very good article, Rob. I do have a to object to one line, though, "I saw canons and fortifications used to defend the right of the rich to own the enslaved." This is not why the so-called "Civil War" was fought.

I don't wish to hijack the thread, but perhaps it is a topic for another day.

Casey

Rob McRay said...

Hey Larry,
Thanks for the link. Unfortunately, I'm having a problem loading your blog today and can't access the Waterfront post. Hopefully I'll figure out the problem soon.
I appreciate your perspective (even when I disagree), and truly appreciate your ministry.
Rob

Rob McRay said...

Thanks, Michael.
Not just the USA--I think people all over the world need eye surgery.
Rob

Rob McRay said...

Hi Casey,
That line wasn't really intended as a comment on the primary reason for the war, but on one of the uses of the war machine.

Having said that, and without hijacking this thread, I'd just add that the reason for the Civil War has been the subject of much debate. Cutting to the bottom line, my take is that Lincoln would probably not have fought the war over the slavery issue alone. His primary concern seems to have been the preservation of the union. The south was certainly concerned with states' rights, but I doubt that they would have fought so bloody a civil war had it not been for the emotional issues surrounding slavery and the threat of abolition. The bigger issue may have been states' rights vs. the union, but a significant emotional issue on both sides was the abolition of slavery.

Thanks for reading and commenting.
Rob

Anonymous said...

WE ARE A MIDDLE CLASS PENSIONER FAMILY WITH TWO MORTGAGES. WE NEVER THE LESS UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE RICH COMPARED TO MANY IN THIS COUNTRY AND FABULOUSLY WEALTHY COMPARED TO MOST OF THE PEOPLE IN THE WORLD. THROUGH NO FAULT OF HER OWN MY WIFE STRUGGLED TO RAISE 5 CHILDREN AS A SINGLE MOTHER. HER VIEWPOINT IS TOTAL COMPASSION FOR THE POOR AND THAT FUELS HER DESIRE TO WORK AT THE HELP CENTER 3 DAYS A WEEK. SHE DOESN`T DRIVE AND I PRAY THAT I CAN CONTINUE TO DRIVE FOR A LONG TIME SO THAT I CAN DRIVE HER TO CHURCH AND THE HELP CENTER 3 DAYS A WEEK. I AM ASHAMED THAT EVEN WITH THIS PERSPECTIVE I TEND TO WALLOW IN THE COMPARATIVE LUXURY THAT I ENJOY.
FRANK LEGGETT, JR

Anonymous said...

Rob,
As usual, I find your answers more satisfying than the pat ones I'm used to hearing.

Thanks again on the reminder of the view "from below".

Casey

Rob McRay said...

Frank,
I appreciate the fact that you and Ann are aware of your situation and conscious of your perspective. That alone changes the way we respond to the needs of others--as it has with Ann's service at the help center.
Rob

Rob McRay said...

Thanks, Casey. I'm not a fan of pat answers myself.
Rob